In my government class in my junior year of high school, my teacher taught my class about civic duty. We studied the Constitution, and I learned then that that document represents a contract between the U.S. government and us, its citizens; and that as citizens, we are guaranteed certain inalienable rights. Those rights include our freedom of speech. Today we have before us a number of proposals, all addressing the issue of campaign reform. The self-proclaimed reformers will talk about the problems of public cynicism, corruption in politics, and abuse of the system. Their proposed solutions will suggest everything from limiting when certain groups did disseminate their message to capping campaign spending and using tax dollars to fund campaigns. The problem is that at the heart of each of these proposals is a muzzle on first amendment rights, the right to freedom of speech. Members may ask, what does campaign financing have to do with free speech? The answer is, absolutely everything. In the landmark Buckley versus Valeo case, the Supreme Court ruled that being able to raise and spend money is necessary for speech.
On the recordMay 22, 1998
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of campaign finance reform on First Amendment rights.
Share
More from ANNE M. NORTHUP
Jul 20, 2005
Well, I am so excited. I know that the gentlewoman is on the committee that is heading this up. It is an enormous challenge and you all are doing a fabulous job. As the rest of us worry about this and study it and provide ideas, we are so…
Oct 17, 2000
for millions of children with learning disabilities in this country, the future is brighter than any other time in this nation's history.
Oct 28, 1999
it gives me a real thrill to be here today and to be part of this debate. When I ran for Congress in 1995, what I told my constituents was that there was a new day in this country, a day of talking about restraint, a day of talking about…





