I will be brief in response to my friend, the gentleman from Maryland, who makes the arguments that the authors of the Dodd-Frank law made, which was that we designed this to be independent. Well, that is fine. That is what they wanted, but they can't do it unconstitutionally. As the Fifth Circuit said very, very well, while the defenders of the structure of the agency, of the CFPB, contend that there is no constitutional infirmity because the funding scheme was actually enacted by Congress in the Dodd-Frank law, and, therefore, it is constitutional. In essence, the bureau contends that because Congress spun the agency's funding mechanism into motion when it passed the act, voila, the appropriations clause is satisfied. That is not the way the Constitution works, Mr. Chair. This body cannot unconstitutionally delegate away our most fundamental power, which is the power of the purse. Vote for the Womack appropriations bill. Restore the power of the purse. Defend this institution.
Share
More from Andy Barr
Let me reclaim my time. Bloomberg reported last week that Russia's government revenues from oil sales rose almost 50 percent compared to last year.
I thank the chairman for his leadership on this issue. Mr. Speaker, I stand in front of you today to support my friend and colleague from Nebraska (Mr. Flood) and his CRA resolution to nullify the SEC's Staff Accounting Bulletin Number 121…
At the same time, our agriculture sector, our hospitality sector in Kentucky, they certainly need legal workers, the horse industry, I’ve had the privilege of representing them and the great thing about the president’s policies that will…
While I rise in support of the rule, and I thank Chairman Burgess for his leadership on giving Members the opportunity to vote on these packages, I also rise to express my profound disappointment that the Biden administration and Democrats…





