I rise in opposition to the Young amendment. Now is the time to improve this 1978 law. The children of Native American descent who are harmed by overbroad application of the Indian Child Welfare Act can not lobby, they can not write letters and they can not wait. It is time to relieve them of the fear of being taken away from their mom and dad and it is time to give children without parents the chance to be adopted. This legislation does not interfere with the Tribal courts jurisdiction over a child on a reservation or a child who has even one parent that is connected with a tribe. Title III of H.R. 3286 simply restores individual freedom to those children and birth-parents whose only connection with a tribe is genetic. I urge my colleagues to support title III.
Todd Tiahrt: “I rise in opposition to the Young amendment. Now is the time to improve this 1978 law. The children of Native American…”
Editor's note · Context
Opposing the Young amendment related to the Indian Child Welfare Act.
Share
More from Todd Tiahrt
I believe, in my estimation, I am waiting for confirmation from the Congressional Budget Office, that it will be out of order.
I just think that we are seeing a bad trend here in America. The Democrat leadership is allowing this trend to continue where resources are being shifted out of the rural areas, because there are a high number of urban Members of Congress…
So, Mr. Chairman, as I understand this, what the gentleman from Utah is doing is his very best to represent the interests of his State. And what the gentleman from Colorado is doing was try to represent the best interests of his State. So…
I would argue that of the $655 billion that we've already had to borrow, you're taking some of that money and applying it to this program so, again, borrowing money from the Chinese.





