On July 11, the D.C. Council passed a bill which would require employers in the District of Columbia to provide contraceptive coverage to their employees. Despite the fact that a good conscience clause exempting employers who wish to waive this on religious or moral obligations was offered, it was not adopted by the council. Furthermore, the debate got rather ugly and some council members espoused anti-Catholic and anti-Christian beliefs in the course of this discussion. One of the provisions that would be deleted by the gentlewoman's amendment would be the requirement for the District of Columbia City Council to go back and reconsider the conscience clause, allowing for religious and moral obligations. Now, if the concern is that there are not contraceptives available in the District of Columbia, according to the Department of Health and Human Services, there are 10 locations inside the District of Columbia where contraceptives can be obtained free. Contraceptives are available in the District of Columbia. There is no reason for the District, for the council to carry on this debate about religious and moral convictions not being applicable.
Todd Tiahrt: “On July 11, the D.C. Council passed a bill which would require employers in the District of Columbia to provide…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing a D.C. Council bill requiring contraceptive coverage and the lack of a conscience clause.
Share
More from Todd Tiahrt
I would argue that of the $655 billion that we've already had to borrow, you're taking some of that money and applying it to this program so, again, borrowing money from the Chinese.
Mr. Speaker, I am also honored to have to carry this bill. And, today, Congress has the honor to approve the bill, naming the post office in Derby, Kansas, after a true American hero, SGT Jamie O'Dell Maugans. Sergeant Maugans was the…
I just think that we are seeing a bad trend here in America. The Democrat leadership is allowing this trend to continue where resources are being shifted out of the rural areas, because there are a high number of urban Members of Congress…
The passage today of the so-called DISCLOSE Act, is a travesty. This bill is a hasty, ill-conceived, un- Constitutional response to the near unanimous decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in Citizens United vs The Federal Election Committee…





