Human Germline gene modification is not needed to save lives, or alleviate suffering, of existing people. Its target population is "prospective people" who have not been conceived. The cultural impact of treating humans as biologically perfectible artifacts would be entirely negative. People who fall short of some technically achievable ideal would be seen as "damaged goods", while the standards for what is genetically desirable will be those of the society's economically and politically dominant groups. This will only increase prejudices and discrimination in a society where too many such prejudices already exist. There is no way to be accountable to those in future generations who are harmed or stigmatized by wrongful or unsuccessful human germline modifications of themselves or their ancestors.
Sam Brownback: “Human Germline gene modification is not needed to save lives, or alleviate suffering, of existing people. Its target…”
Editor's note · Context
Introducing an amendment to prohibit human germline gene modification.
Share
More from Sam Brownback
We're very concerned about this storm. Believe it may be worse than the last one.
Speaker Pelosi and Majority Leader Reid prefer to let taxes increase on all Americans rather than see the defeat of their 'divide and rule' strategy of class warfare.
it gives me great pleasure to join with my colleagues today and honor a native Kansan who, 52 years ago, committed an act of courage that was the basis for inspiring many civil rights movements throughout our country, the late Dr. Ronald…
I would also like to draw attention to an issue that I think is about the most important to our Nation. We recently won a major trade case against the European Union and their subsidization of Airbus. This is an effort by the European…





