I want to say, as one who does not support the troop surge, I think it is important we have a full process. I think it is important we have a full process where amendments are allowed and where people are allowed to bring forward different ideas and thoughts. It is the key issue of our day. It is an important issue of our day. It is something that shouldn't be drug out, but I don't think asking for three, or four even, amendments to this resolution is something that would drag it out because that is what allows full discussion, and we certainly need a full discussion on the record on the ways forward. I think it is also appropriate for us to do that in light of the division of powers between the executive and legislative branches. The President is the Commander in Chief, and he or she must move forward in that capacity. We are the funding arm, the legislative body. We are entitled to put forward our ideas, but there is one Commander in Chief. I think it is important we have this discussion to put forward our ideas, but it needs to be a full discussion of the ideas.
Sam Brownback: “I want to say, as one who does not support the troop surge, I think it is important we have a full process. I think it…”
On the recordFebruary 15, 2007
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the importance of a full legislative process regarding the troop surge in Iraq.
Share
More from Sam Brownback
Aug 5, 2010
To add insult to injury, this President is coming to Texas next week to raise campaign cash but apparently does not have an hour--not even 15 minutes--to spare for our American workers whose jobs he is killing.
Sep 27, 2010
Speaker Pelosi and Majority Leader Reid prefer to let taxes increase on all Americans rather than see the defeat of their 'divide and rule' strategy of class warfare.
Aug 5, 2010
The signal this Democratic Congress is sending is clear: We'll spend whatever taxpayer money it takes to save a government job; the rest of you American workers can take a hike.





