I would like to be sure that, by using the word ``and'', the conferees did not intend that a business aircraft would have to be described in both the existing subparagraph (B) and the new subparagraph (C) in order to qualify for the additional year to place the aircraft in service. As the chairman knows, the standards for qualification are substantially different under the two subparagraphs.
Seeking clarification on tax code amendments related to business aircraft qualifications.
Share
More from Sam Brownback
We have to get more focus on this by a broader cross-section, or we will not be effective in this.
I would continue the policies that have been done in the prior administration in working on these international issues.
I thought the Frank Wolf act really improved on what took place in the 1998 act.
The beauty of what this job has been I think under the prior administration and this one is that there are contentious issues that people do not agree upon.
Other voices in this conversation
