But we found, time and time again, people act rationally. They act economically rationally. So if you send a signal that you are going to tax something, they will do less of it. And if you send a signal you are going to subsidize something, they do more of it. So we tax marriage, and what do you think happens in that type of situation where you put more financial pressure on the family? The $1,445 is the average. There are some that are taxed substantially more. I read to my colleagues, and the Senator from Missouri, letters from a number of people who have written in and said, ``I cannot believe you guys would talk about family values, all of you, everybody saying that families are critical, families are important, yet here is such a classic example of where you are penalizing the family, and it still exists, and you guys are still talking about family values.''
Sam Brownback: “But we found, time and time again, people act rationally. They act economically rationally. So if you send a signal that…”
On the recordJuly 29, 1998
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the impact of the marriage tax penalty on families.
Share
More from Sam Brownback
Jul 28, 2010
I wanted to engage my colleague from North Dakota because there is a strong base of bipartisan support to do this, and I also believe there is a strong majority community across America that supports this. Don't get it out there so wild…
Feb 25, 2013
We're very concerned about this storm. We believe it may be worse than the last one.
Jul 17, 2012
My major concern . . . is the jobs in Kansas. Wichita is the air capital of the world, and we've got more major air companies there than anyplace in the world: Boeing, Airbus and all the [general aviation],
Jan 2, 2017
we have to get more focus on this by a broader cross-section, or we will not be effective in this.





