Less than one-third. Out of every $5 surplus you have, $1.50 is going back to married families. Does that make any rational sense here, that we are getting $5 in and saying, OK, $1.50 is back. I think we ought to be doing far more. This ought to start the overall situation, but we are looking at least a start here. This is the sort of thing we need to do. We need to move. You ought to see the groups supporting this. The National Taxpayers Union, with 300,000 members, strongly supports the Marriage Tax Elimination Act. The Marriage Tax Elimination Act would address that and dramatically widen the scope of tax relief. This is a broad tax relief issue--21 million families, not just individuals, 21 million families, in America pay this tax penalty. Currently, laws force many married Americans to pay a higher tax bill than they would if they remained single and had the same combined income. Such a double standard is wholly at odds with the American ideal that taxes should not be a primary consideration in any individual's economic or social choices.
Sam Brownback: “Less than one-third. Out of every $5 surplus you have, $1.50 is going back to married families. Does that make any…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the Marriage Tax Elimination Act and its implications for married families.
Share
More from Sam Brownback
We have gone even further to boost small businesses, because those businesses are the engine of job creation for our Kansas families.
I don't mean to be too blunt, but raising taxes on the consumers and small businesses we depend on the most to put this economy back on track is a dumb economic move.
The beauty of what this job has been I think under the prior administration and this one is that there are contentious issues that people do not agree upon.
I look forward to working with people, working with you, working with everybody, regardless of their ideas or views, on how we can advance the agenda of religious freedom.





