Political Quotes

Nancy Kassebaum: We have visited and revisited this issue many times. We struggled with the House of Representatives over this issue for…

On the recordMarch 14, 1996
We have visited and revisited this issue many times. We struggled with the House of Representatives over this issue for 3 frustrating, unproductive months, and we could not resolve it. We finally agreed to let the matter be resolved in the authorizing legislation. Why then, as some of my colleagues are asking, would Senator Hatfield choose to reopen the debate in the current legislation? I suggest, Mr. President, for two very important reasons: First of all, the authorizers punted. They did not address the issue in the authorizing language. Thus, we are left with an authorizing bill that was reported out of conference which does not address this issue. This part of the compromise, which we added to the last CR, was not fulfilled. Second, the language that Senator Hatfield has added to the current continuing resolution is sound policy. As he has just so eloquently stated, the simple, honest truth is that maintaining effective family planning programs is the best hope we have of limiting abortions. It is an elementary equation, I believe, that contraception does reduce abortions. Mr. President, arguments to the contrary are just misinformed. We cannot prevent abortions worldwide by preventing women from having access to the very information and services that enable them to prevent unplanned pregnancies. I applaud my friend from Oregon for his thoughtfulness on this issue.
Said by
Nancy Kassebaum
Republican · Kansas

Editor's note · Context

Discussing the importance of family planning programs in relation to abortion during Senate debate.

Share

More from Nancy Kassebaum

Sep 20, 1996

I would also note that S. 1044 continues an authority in current law that permits the Secretary to designate a population as "medically underserved" if the chief executive officer of a State and local officials recommend that designation…

govinfo.gov
Sep 11, 1996

no, this is not another study. It is a sense-of-the-Senate resolution. So it does not have statutory authority as the language of the Senator from Oregon would have had. However, it does not call for another study. It simply says that the…

govinfo.gov
Apr 25, 1996

as I stand here today with my colleagues discussing a new plan to balance the budget, I can guess what many Americans are probably thinking: ``Here they go again.'' The budget has been the catalyst driving our agenda for more than a year…

govinfo.gov
Apr 23, 1996

These words are meant to broadly preclude the use of any of the categories insurance companies have historically used to deny people coverage based on health status and related factors-- that reasonably could lead a health plan to believe…

govinfo.gov

Other voices in this conversation