I rise to discuss, again, legislation that has been before us, which is support for the Teamwork for Employees and Management Act, the TEAM Act. During the past couple of days, we have had some lengthy debate on this legislation, as well as, of course, repeal of the 4.3-cent gas tax, and raising the minimum wage. I thought it might be useful at this point to review some of the debate back and forth on the TEAM Act, what it does and does not do, and dispel some of the myths that have surfaced over the course of the debate. The TEAM Act responds to a series of decisions by the National Labor Relations Board that invalidated numerous employee involvement programs. The NLRB decisions that have been made regarding employee-employer relationships have been very broad. They found that the National Labor Relations Act of 1935 prohibited supervisors from meeting with workers in committees to discuss workplace issues like health and safety, working conditions, family leave, and other important areas of mutual concern. The TEAM Act simply establishes a safe harbor in Federal labor law to permit these types of employee involvement programs, where workers meet with supervisors to discuss issues of mutual concern, to continue to exist without running afoul of Federal labor law.
Nancy Kassebaum: “I rise to discuss, again, legislation that has been before us, which is support for the Teamwork for Employees and…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the Teamwork for Employees and Management Act during a floor debate.
Share
More from Nancy Kassebaum
Yesterday three Swiss Red Cross relief workers were killed in Burundi. I want to express my condolences to the International Committee of the Red Cross and the families of the deceased. The ICRC staff were attacked as they returned from a…
I just visited with Senator Helms to ask him what he thought of the provision before us. He pointed out that his language is much more narrowly drawn. It applies only to the Federal Employees Health Benefits Plan and includes some specific…
I suggest that we have been in the 104th Congress for 2 years. This legislation was introduced in the House some time ago. It would have been useful to us here in the U.S. Senate if this legislation had been before us prior to July 31. We…
It just is not the case that education has been slashed by Republicans over the last 6 to 8 years, and I really find it very disappointing that somehow this keeps coming up. It is easy to make a statement saying education has been slashed…





