just to clarify, displaced homemakers is listed in the bill. It is a category under ``dislocated workers,'' and that is true with the definition that I gave earlier. But it is a benchmark under the dislocated worker section as something that should be addressed without setting aside any special allocation. So just to clarify, we were conscious of it being an important population. It was not addressed as the Senator from Ohio would like to see it by his amendment. I do not want people to think we did not debate this and were not cognizant of that group.
Nancy Kassebaum: “just to clarify, displaced homemakers is listed in the bill. It is a category under ``dislocated workers,'' and that is…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the inclusion of displaced homemakers in a bill related to dislocated workers.
Share
More from Nancy Kassebaum
no, this is not another study. It is a sense-of-the-Senate resolution. So it does not have statutory authority as the language of the Senator from Oregon would have had. However, it does not call for another study. It simply says that the…
This provision is meant to prohibit insurers or employers from excluding employees in a group from coverage or charging them higher premiums based on their health status and other related factors that could lead to higher health costs…
just to respond, we have considered this in the last Congress as well. We have not had a full-blown hearing but it is something Senator Metzenbaum, as part of the Labor Committee in the last Congress, raised. It has been under…
It just is not the case that education has been slashed by Republicans over the last 6 to 8 years, and I really find it very disappointing that somehow this keeps coming up. It is easy to make a statement saying education has been slashed…





