This motion to recommit is concerning to me, and I encourage a ``yes'' vote. I would just like to highlight one provision because there has been a great deal of press lately about the misuse of government computers and the waste of time and taxpayer dollars by Federal employees at the Securities and Exchange Commission who are spending as much as 8 hours a day viewing pornography on government computers. However, this problem is not limited just to the SEC. The Inspector General at the National Science Foundation, which is authorized by this Act, found similar problems there. So what happened to these employees? According to the Inspector General, and I quote, NSF issued a formal proposal followed by a decision suspending them for 10 calendar days without pay. Ten days' suspension, unacceptable. Taxpayers deserve better. This motion to recommit is simple. If you're a government employee, and you are disciplined for viewing, downloading, or e-mailing pornography, including child pornography, on government computers or during work hours, you will no longer be paid. You will be fired. If you think a couple of days of suspension, a reprimand, a transfer is the right response when someone uses government computers to spread pornography, then vote against this motion. But if you think spreading pornography with a government computer is an act that should lead to dismissal, then vote for this motion. I urge a vote for this motion.
Lynn Jenkins: “This motion to recommit is concerning to me, and I encourage a ``yes'' vote. I would just like to highlight one…”
Editor's note · Context
The speaker addresses the misuse of government computers by federal employees and advocates for stricter disciplinary measures.
Share
More from Lynn Jenkins
My amendment is also supported by the TRSA, MAPPS, the Business Coalition for Fair Competition, and the American Conservative Union. Mr. Chairman, I will submit their statements in support for the Record. Submitted for the Record in…
I would like to yield 2 minutes to the gentlelady from South Dakota (Mrs. Noem).
The most troubling part of the letter is that the hospital notes, that the physician supervision requirements have no impact on the quality of care.
I withdraw my point of order and seek time in opposition to the motion. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The point of order is withdrawn. The gentlewoman from Kansas is recognized for 5 minutes.





