the U.S. economy has shown truly amazing resilience after the many challenges of the last few years, including: a terrorist attack, war, corporate scandals and recession. In spite of these factors: real GDP growth was 8.2 percent in the 3rd quarter of 2003, the highest pace in two decades, housing starts are at the highest level in 20 years, mortgage rates are the lowest in over 30 years, and payroll employment has increased by 364,000 jobs in the past 6 months. This is good news for every American family. Economic growth is the key to prosperity for everyone. And the Republican budget is the plan that will ensure that these growth trends continue. One way this budget encourages sustained economic growth is by not raising taxes. Under the budget drafted by Chairman Nussle, there will be no reduction in the child tax credit, no increase in the marriage penalty, and no lowering of the income limit for the 10 percent tax bracket. Raising taxes, as the Democrats have proposed, would be a severe blow to the recovering economy and to young families. The Democrats believe that taxes should be raised to pay for more government spending. During the Budget Committee markup the Democrats proposed to increase spending by $28.6 billion next year, paid for by raising taxes by $28.9 billion next year. I ask my colleagues, why do we need more spending and higher taxes? Spending by the Federal Government has reached over $20,000 per household. I find that total staggering.
Jim Ryun: “the U.S. economy has shown truly amazing resilience after the many challenges of the last few years, including: a…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the resilience of the U.S. economy and the implications of the Republican budget.
Share
More from Jim Ryun
amidst the controversy surrounding the Pledge of Allegiance, I fear that we have forgotten our Founding Fathers' true intentions behind the establishment clause in the Constitution. While our critics argue that the words ``under God''…
I do not want to see our military installations turned into abortion clinics. I urge a strong ``no'' in opposition to the Sanchez amendment.
the global HIV epidemic issue cannot and must not be ignored. People are dying from this disease, and we know how to help them. Our duty is to promote good public policy that saves lives, and we have an opportunity today to do that. As we…
$164 billion of new Federal spending took place between 2001 and 2003, unrelated to defense and the events of 9/11. We are borrowing to spend, and we need to bring spending under control or we put future generations, our children and…





