The legislation says that if there is any reduction from the amount that is authorized to be appropriated for any Federal activity we pass on the floor, if there is any reduction, that triggers the option for States and localities whether or not they want to implement it. There is another alternative. If in that legislation the authorizing committee specifies that the Federal agency, the executive branch, has the option of paring back the program, choosing what activities they want to conduct and which they do not, it gives that kind of prerogative to the executive branch to decide what part of an authorization they choose to implement and how they want to cut it back if there was such an across-the-board cut in the appropriations bill.
Jerry Moran: “The legislation says that if there is any reduction from the amount that is authorized to be appropriated for any…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of federal funding reductions on state and local implementation of programs.
Share
More from Jerry Moran
This bipartisan legislation would make a difference against Russia’s unjust war in Ukraine and serves as a fitting tribute to the legacy of Senator Lindsey Graham.
As we head into the fall and winter, taxpayers expect the government to be prepared to respond quickly and effectively to keep roads open and the public safe, which requires a reliable supply of de-icing salt.
I have visited every hospital in Kansas numerous times, and these conversations help guide my efforts to make certain health care providers across our state have the support they need to provide critical services to patients in their…
Earlier this year, Artemis II made history and showed the world that our greatest days of discovery are still ahead.





