The legislation says that if there is any reduction from the amount that is authorized to be appropriated for any Federal activity we pass on the floor, if there is any reduction, that triggers the option for States and localities whether or not they want to implement it. There is another alternative. If in that legislation the authorizing committee specifies that the Federal agency, the executive branch, has the option of paring back the program, choosing what activities they want to conduct and which they do not, it gives that kind of prerogative to the executive branch to decide what part of an authorization they choose to implement and how they want to cut it back if there was such an across-the-board cut in the appropriations bill.
Jerry Moran: “The legislation says that if there is any reduction from the amount that is authorized to be appropriated for any…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of federal funding reductions on state and local implementation of programs.
Share
More from Jerry Moran
the month we are in, the month of October, is Domestic Violence Awareness Month--the time that we should recognize the devastating impact domestic violence continues to have on individuals, families, and communities across our States and…
this evening, I want to recognize the upcoming anniversary of an important day in our Nation's history and in our military history. September 9 marks the beginning of the Italian campaign of World War II in 1943, a campaign that was only…
I rise today to honor Texarkana College. Earlier this month, the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board released its 2024 accountability measures, and I am proud to share that Texarkana College has earned the number one ranking in the…
I rise today to honor Charlie Cano. As CEO of Etex, Charlie leads his team to great successes. Charlie is a leader whose work has truly changed lives across rural Texas. I am proud to congratulate him on receiving the Neville Haynes Award…





