We are about to begin a very important and difficult debate. Both sides have strong, credible arguments. But I would urge those who are opposed to what the President has suggested to offer their own alternative. Because it does seem as though, while the President has chosen a bad option, it is the best of all the alternatives, and that is the difficulty. ISIS is expanding exponentially in terms of the size of its force, its financial and military wherewithal. If ISIS was, for example, to be able to lay siege to Baghdad, where we have a substantial presence of American personnel, what do we do then? Clearly we would have to be militarily engaged. This is a difficult debate, but I would urge those who chose any of the credible reasons for voting against it to tell us what they would do instead. ____________________
Share
More from Jerry Moran
today I want to speak about a program that has shaped our Nation's humanitarian efforts and made a significant impact on my home State of Kansas, a program called Food for Peace. In 1953, agricultural surpluses had reached an alltime high…
for the entire time that I have been a Member of the U.S. Senate, I have had the privilege of having on my team a Kansan who invests his time, his energy, his passion--he gives his heart for helping my constituents, for helping our…
this week, the Senate Banking Committee-- the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs--advanced the nomination of Michelle ``Miki'' Bowman to be the Vice Chair for Supervision at the Federal Reserve. Miki Bowman is my…
I want to make certain that in no way does Russia get a pass in either your mind or your heart, or in any policy recommendation you might make or not make.





