It had been my hope following the policy luncheon that we would have a major shortening of the list of amendments on the other side of the aisle. As I understand, there has been really no effort to limit the amendments, except they picked out five or six amendments which are not germane and suggested time agreements on the nongermane amendments. I do not know the merits of this amendment. It may be a very good amendment. I do not debate the Senator from Massachusetts. I do not believe it was suggested in the President's bill--in any of the President's bills. Again, the President sent me a letter on May 25 outlining his objectives for an antiterrorism bill. There is nothing with reference to this amendment in it. The President did change. We had a vote on the taggants amendment yesterday. We accepted another gun amendment. I think what this has become is the Democrats are bringing up all the gun amendments they have been keeping in their closet. Mr. President, we are not going to play that game. I made the best effort I could to work with the White House in an effort to pass antiterrorism legislation, but the Democrats just insist they do not want to do that. They do not want to pass antiterrorism legislation. They have already forgotten what happened in Oklahoma City. They want to have a big debate out here, a big political debate to try to score a few political points, and that is not going to happen.
Bob Dole: “It had been my hope following the policy luncheon that we would have a major shortening of the list of amendments on the…”
On the recordJune 6, 1995
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the lack of effort to limit amendments related to antiterrorism legislation.
Share
More from Bob Dole
Aug 2, 2007
this bill seeks revenues for the very laudable State Children's Health Insurance Program by unfairly taxing tobacco products. I urge my colleagues to acknowledge the reality that this tax increase is an irresponsible and fiscally unsound…
Feb 4, 2020
Poor people don't make political contributions. You might get a different result if there were a poor PAC up here in Washington.
Dec 18, 2007
Harry Truman was wrong. Truman famously defined a statesman as ``a politician who has been dead for 20 years.'' It is a good line, but it wasn't true then, as Truman's own career attests, and it is not true today. That said, we can never…





