today we take up economically targeted investments [ETI's]. Those who support ETI's represent they are safe, prudent ways to encourage investments in low-income housing, infrastructure, and business. However, nothing could be further from the truth. ETI's are simply a backdoor for the Clinton administration to finance liberal social programs, and for the Department of Labor to sneak around laws that direct pension fund managers to invest solely for the financial benefit of plan participants. This pursuit of ETI's is frightening. It is dangerous to the security of private pension savings. The overriding concern for pension investors must be fiscal soundness not liberal, social programs that could cost a 35-year-old worker $43,298 in pension income by the time he or she retires at the age of 65. Mr. Speaker, as a cosponsor of H.R. 1594, I strongly urge all of my colleagues to support this measure, restoring law and fiscal responsibility within the Department of Labor.
Jasper Packard: “today we take up economically targeted investments [ETI's]. Those who support ETI's represent they are safe, prudent…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing concerns about economically targeted investments during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Jasper Packard
I will do all I can to get the Navy to do a better job of communicating and working with us, but the fact is napalm under the plan is safer to ship than gasoline, and we ship gasoline on the streets of our communities all across America…
I simply have to oppose this amendment because it totally eliminates the Nuclear Energy Research Initiative, which I think would be a terrible mistake. This has been an initiative very modestly funded while essential to keep nuclear energy…
this bill is $60 million on alternative fuels more than last year's, so we have not neglected that area. We have raised it even from where it was as it passed out of the House.
I would like to stand in support of H.J. Res. 37, which will make it more difficult to raise taxes. It is time Congress puts a stop to the raid on the pocket books of American citizens. H.J. Res. 37 will require a two-thirds supermajority…





