On the recordSeptember 28, 2000
This bill is $60 million on alternative fuels more than last year's, so we have not neglected that area. We have raised it even from where it was as it passed out of the House.
Source
govinfo.govJasper Packard: “This bill is $60 million on alternative fuels more than last year's, so we have not neglected that area. We have raised…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing funding for alternative fuels during a House debate.
Share
More from Jasper Packard
Jun 27, 2000
The gentleman and I have discussed this previously, and we certainly would like to work with the gentleman in trying to find additional funds for this project in conference with the Senate. If the Senate has a higher figure, there is a…
Jun 27, 2000
We certainly do wish and we hope that we could take care of the gentleman's problem in conference, and I assure him that we will make every effort to do so. The $100,000 is not a great deal of money; and if we get additional funds, we may…
Jun 27, 2000
Should the committee receive a revised 302(b) allocation which increases our funding level, then our effort will be to consider increasing funding for the ARC to at least the fiscal year 2000 funding level.
Jun 27, 2000
The gentleman is correct. If any committee of Congress wishes to take action regarding the off-site disposal issue the Commission is now considering, it ought to be the relevant authorization committee of the House that does it. I would…
Other voices in this conversation
