this is a strange rule. In almost 50 years in the House, I have seen a lot of strange rules, but I think this is probably the strangest and probably the most political. The Committee on Appropriations had gone out of its way to approve the amendment offered by the gentleman from Wisconsin (Mr. Obey) to re-fund the National Endowment for the Arts. This rule kills the action of the subcommittee. And, incidentally, that vote was a bipartisan one. Not only the Democrats, but five Republicans helped pass the Obey amendment. This rule kills the action of the Committee by denying a waiver that would bar a point of order for lack of authorization of the program. Then the rule turns around, having taken the money away from NEA, and tries to put it back by giving the gentlewoman from Connecticut (Mrs. Johnson) the opportunity to offer an amendment to restore it. My good friend, the chairman of the Committee on Rules, says 'What could be fairer than that?' I will tell the gentleman that, in my opinion, what could be fairer than that would be if he had provided the waiver for NEA that he gave to about 30 other unauthorized programs in the bill. NEA was unfairly singled out for the denial of a waiver.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing a rule affecting funding for the National Endowment for the Arts during House debate.
Share
More from Sidney Yates
I certainly agree with the statement made by the distinguished gentleman from Illinois. My district also will suffer from the lack of Section 8 housing. As the gentleman said so eloquently, there is no shortage in the need for Section 8…
The government does not actually control the giving of the grants. That is in the hands of panels, of civilians who are expert in the field. They are the ones who make the original selections. It is true that there has to be a censorship…
I would tell the gentleman I would not have objected to his amendment had he included as well protection for the National Endowment for the Arts.
Let us not talk about level playing fields. There is no more discriminated people in this country than the Indian people have been and still remain discriminated against. They talk about, some of the speakers who have spoken before talked…





