I did not sign the conference agreement because I am very strongly opposed to the bill. It is true that in many respects after the negotiations that have taken place over these last few days the bill is better than it was before the negotiations. But in my opinion, the bill is so bad it is not susceptible to correction. For example, it badly hurts the Indian people, their health, their education. It hurts the national parks by taking money from essential construction and moving it over to operations. It hurts the national forests by increasing the timber cut, by building timber roads in ancient forests and jeopardizing habitat, wetlands, and environment. It sounds the death knell for the Endowments for the Acts and the Humanities. And by its use of sufficiency language in various paragraphs of the bill, it deprives the public from participating in the decisions that it would want to make in connection with the environment. There are many other deficiencies in the bill. Time does not permit going into them.
Editor's note · Context
Opposing a bill during a conference on environmental and indigenous issues.
Share
More from Sidney Yates
Let us not talk about level playing fields. There is no more discriminated people in this country than the Indian people have been and still remain discriminated against. They talk about, some of the speakers who have spoken before talked…
Personally, Mr. Chairman, I support neither tax cut, and I support reducing the deficit.
the gentleman from Wisconsin talked about a $15 billion excess in discretionary spending. The Defense appropriations bill is $13 billion over the President's budget. There is $13 billion of the gentleman's $15 billion, because defense is a…
Mr. Speaker, this is a motion to instruct the conferees on the Interior appropriations bill, to accept the provisions of the Senate bill improving funding for the National Endowment of the Arts. The House, my colleagues will recall…





