The gentleman from Wisconsin talked about a $15 billion excess in discretionary spending. The Defense appropriations bill is $13 billion over the President's budget. There is $13 billion of the gentleman's $15 billion, because defense is a part of discretionary spending. Why did the proponents of this amendment not offer their amendment to the Defense bill when the bill was on the floor? They could have achieved a much greater amount of money than they do with a bill of this kind.
Sidney Yates: “The gentleman from Wisconsin talked about a $15 billion excess in discretionary spending. The Defense appropriations…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing discretionary spending and defense appropriations during a floor debate.
Share
More from Sidney Yates
I certainly agree with the statement made by the distinguished gentleman from Illinois. My district also will suffer from the lack of Section 8 housing. As the gentleman said so eloquently, there is no shortage in the need for Section 8…
We just do not know what the figures actually are, according to what the staff tells me. The gentleman has certain figures. We are trying to get the figures from the proper authorities so that we are in a position to do justice to the…
1998 marks the centennial of Guam's relationship with the United States. As the gentleman knows, during World War II, Guam was the only American territory occupied by the Japanese. The people of Guam were steadfast in their desire for…
What the gentleman is asking to do is take care of his tribe and take money away from the other tribes, because the committee, has not put enough money into this bill. What the gentleman ought to be doing, I think, is asking for more money…





