I think what ought to be done is for the chairman and for me to take this problem into the conference and see if we can get more money, rather than to rearrange the way it is distributed; let us try to get more money so we can provide the money for the tribes that have followed the new rules. But we do need more money in order to take care of all the tribes, I do not think there is any question about that. But to rearrange it so some money goes to your tribe and none for the others, I think is unfair.
Sidney Yates: “I think what ought to be done is for the chairman and for me to take this problem into the conference and see if we can…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing funding distribution for tribes during a conference.
Share
More from Sidney Yates
I think that does not vitiate the error that took place in not having waived the rule of the House for NEA, as was done for the other programs. For 10 years we have brought our bill to the Committee on Rules asking for a waiver of all the…
What the gentleman is asking to do is take care of his tribe and take money away from the other tribes, because the committee, has not put enough money into this bill. What the gentleman ought to be doing, I think, is asking for more money…
May I say that I do not consider it a big windfall. I think that the tribe, on the basis of the explanation given by the gentleman from Mississippi, deserves that money, but to do so at the present time without having all of the figures…
The gentleman from Guam has expressed his interest in having $300,000 of those funds allocated to establish a War Restitution Study Commission to verify claims from the people of Guam for the purpose of determining amounts of individual…





