Political Quotes

On the recordMay 3, 1994
as the year progresses, the debate over immigration policy grows more and more heated. Calls for restrictions on immigration--both legal and illegal--are accompanied by claims that immigrants represent a drain on our economy and a threat to American values. These sentiments manifest themselves in immigration-related amendments that are being offered to virtually every bill that reaches the Senate floor. More often than not, however, the debate over immigration policy seems driven not by reason, but by emotion. Facts take a backseat to impressions, and these impressions are often misguided. If we are to undertake to reform our immigration laws--and I do not deny that these laws are in need of some reform--we must understand the facts of our current immigration regime, and withstand the desire to rely on empty rhetoric. I am not alone in my views. Recently the Washington Times--in an article entitled ``Immigration Facts and Fiction,'' written by my friend Ben Wattenberg--counseled Americans to find and understand the facts underlying our current immigration system before undertaking a comprehensive reform of that system. The Times article, citing a recently published study by the Urban Institute on the costs of immigration, noted several important facts that should bear on any attempted immigration reform: The majority of illegal entrants into the United States are individuals who overstay their visas, not individuals who illegally cross our borders.
Said by
Sen. Paul Simon
Illinois

Editor's note · Context

Addressing the heated debate over immigration policy and the need for factual understanding in reform efforts.

Share

More from Sen. Paul Simon

Mar 1, 1994

The National Taxpayers Union just released a poll done of 1,000 Americans asking about this constitutional amendment: Favoring it, 67 percent; opposing it, 18 percent. That is almost 4 to 1. That simply underscores it. Then, in terms of…

govinfo.gov
Mar 1, 1994

first, two points made by my friend--and he is my friend--from Nevada, Senator Reid, on the language of our amendment. We have gone over this carefully in all kinds of hearings. The only language change is the Danforth language on judicial…

govinfo.gov
Apr 21, 1994

I thank my colleagues, particularly Senator Kennedy, the chairman of the committee, and Senator Durenberger, who has been very helpful on this, as well as other things. We would not have the Direct Lending Program today but for Senator…

govinfo.gov
Mar 1, 1994

let me respond just very briefly to my friend and colleague, Senator Kennedy, in his brief remarks. When he says this will result in the President having authority to impound, there is not one word in this amendment that gives the…

govinfo.gov

Other voices in this conversation