I think he has made an important point; this amendment is introduced for political cover only.
Editor's note · Context
The speaker is discussing the motivations behind a proposed amendment.
Share
More from Sen. Paul Simon
Absolutely not. And the argument that we are taking away Presidential prerogative is not valid. The President has the obligation to submit a balanced budget. But the President may very well say, because of circumstances, we are in a…
we are all heavily dependent on our staffs and the support people around here. We are dependent on the pages and the people who take down our words and the people who tell us what is pending, the people who guard this establishment and the…
You face a much harsher judge than this Committee, and that is the judgment of history, and that judgment is likely to revolve around the question, did you restrict freedom or did you expand it.
The answer is that it would, and that is why we have that flexibility. We do not go as far as Thomas Jefferson wanted to go. He wanted to absolutely prohibit any Federal Government borrowing.





