Thank you, Mr. President. I agree with everything he said. There is all sweetness and light. It will not be all sweetness and light when we get to these amendments. But what we are asking is on that voluntary basis, and the Senator from Kansas used the word voluntary and I would underscore it. That is what this calls for, a voluntary establishment of high academic standards. And then do something that I have heard the Senator from Rhode Island say over and over again. In fact, I have stolen this process from him. He says, ``When I speak to students, I ask them if they are being challenged enough.'' And overwhelmingly they say they are not being challenged enough. I have stolen that technique from the Senator from Rhode Island without giving him credit, I regret to say. But absolutely we ought to be doing more. Parental involvement; Senator Dodd has talked about this, Senator Hatfield has been excellent on this. The PTA has been urging us to do more. The local school councils established by the city of Chicago did not cost us a penny; gotten parents involved, and there is no question that has helped the Chicago schools. Senator Wellstone and I will be offering an amendment to strengthen the opportunity-to-learn standards. I hope we can get something worked out on that. And then I would finally urge that we recognize--this is one piece of the puzzle. This is a step forward. It is a small step forward. We need other steps forward.
Editor's note · Context
The speaker discusses the need for voluntary high academic standards and parental involvement in education.
Share
More from Sen. Paul Simon
Such an amendment would be a political mistake. It would allow a mere 40 out of 100 senators and a similar minority in the House to block legislation that would create a deficit. And because the amendment includes no enforcement procedure…
Judge Barkett, from every evidence I have seen--and I have gone through the record, I was there for part of the hearing--is eminently well qualified. The charge that she is soft on crime, or does not favor the death penalty--that really…
The answer is that we could, but the argument that my colleague from Michigan makes is precisely the opposite of the argument that we have been hearing over and over and over again on the floor. Some of my colleagues say this is too tough…
The answer is that it would, and that is why we have that flexibility. We do not go as far as Thomas Jefferson wanted to go. He wanted to absolutely prohibit any Federal Government borrowing.





