Such an amendment would be a political mistake. It would allow a mere 40 out of 100 senators and a similar minority in the House to block legislation that would create a deficit. And because the amendment includes no enforcement procedure, it would drag courts where they do not belong--into routine budget disputes. Fiddling with the Constitution could be defensible if a mighty public purpose were at stake. But Mr. Simon's amendment, and substitute versions also up for voting, would engrave into the Constitution a standard--zero deficits--that makes little economic sense. The deficit, as measured by Congress, takes no account of inflation, no account of growth, no account of recession and no account of the value of public investment. Yes, the Federal deficit over the last 15 years has been too high. When the Government spends more than it taxes, it borrows the balance. Borrowing threatens to siphon money away from businesses that would have used it for plants and equipment. When this happen, the private economy is left less productive--a blow to our children's living standards. So Federal borrowing must be contained.
Editor's note · Context
The speaker is addressing concerns about a proposed constitutional amendment to require a balanced federal budget.
Share
More from Sen. Paul Simon
I think he has made an important point; this amendment is introduced for political cover only.
I will yield myself 1 minute simply to commend my colleague from Maine for his excellent, logical remarks. And particularly, he is a wordsmith. When he comes up with a phrase, 'fiscal child abuse,' that is precisely what we are doing. We…
I am rising because the FBI has, this week, released their hate crimes statistics. Back about 3 years ago we passed legislation to ask the FBI to do this, and they have been doing it. The good news is about twice as many law enforcement…
The National Taxpayers Union just released a poll done of 1,000 Americans asking about this constitutional amendment: Favoring it, 67 percent; opposing it, 18 percent. That is almost 4 to 1. That simply underscores it. Then, in terms of…





