let me first say I was utterly amazed in the Committee on Science when I offered my amendment. I thought it would be noncontroversial. We had a number of amendments that there may have been some controversy and debate back and forth on, but I thought offering an amendment that would require an independent study of our government to address one of the major problems in the United States today, the loss of manufacturing and other high-tech jobs offshore, certainly would be acceptable to both sides of the aisle.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing an amendment related to the loss of manufacturing and high-tech jobs during a Committee on Science meeting.
Share
More from Jerry F. Costello
So I don't think that we should be penny wise and pound foolish. Yes, we could save the penny, but in the end it is going to cost more money over time to delay a lot of what we are proposing.
While NASA's commercial crew development activities offer exciting opportunities for the future, these public-private partnerships represent a new approach to acquisition and human spaceflight that pose unique questions and challenges for…
And just for the record, I call the other body the black hole. Everything that goes over there disappears and never comes back.
With the retirement of the Space Shuttle, NASA is now fully dependent on Russia for transportation services to the ISS for at least the next five years.





