Let me first say I was utterly amazed in the Committee on Science when I offered my amendment. I thought it would be noncontroversial. We had a number of amendments that there may have been some controversy and debate back and forth on, but I thought offering an amendment that would require an independent study of our government to address one of the major problems in the United States today, the loss of manufacturing and other high-tech jobs offshore, certainly would be acceptable to both sides of the aisle.
Jerry F. Costello: “Let me first say I was utterly amazed in the Committee on Science when I offered my amendment. I thought it would be…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing an amendment related to the loss of manufacturing and high-tech jobs during a Committee on Science meeting.
Share
More from Jerry F. Costello
Given that there are other high-risk, hazardous industries such as the nuclear power industry, that do not have similar shared risks, why is it necessary for the Federal Government to continue this structure for the commercial space launch…
Based on what we reported in our management alerts and what I testified to today, we are gravely concerned about the conditions that we see in the CBP facilities at the border.
I thought it was crazy to try and design a multibillion-dollar system using taxpayers' money without involving those who, in fact, would operate the system.
There is a mismatch between what we expect NASA to do and how much we fund it.





