the definition of ETI's, which is the first time to my knowledge that ETI's have ever been legally defined in any of the regulations or in the law, states: Are defined as investments selected for economic benefits they create, in addition to investment return to the employee benefit investor. Now, what my colleagues are doing here is hyping something that is not a part of the prudent man rule at all. That is, investments returns aside from those that will come to the participants and to the beneficiaries of the trust. I do not mean to say that there cannot be incidental benefits to any investment, but you do not spend millions of dollars, as the DOL is concerned, coming up with a new definition and going out and hyping and promoting it and hawking it.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the legal definition of ETIs and their implications for investment returns.
Share
More from Harris Fawell
Mr. Chairman, it all depends on how we look at legislation like this, whether we see opportunities, as I see, or whether we see a lot of limitations, as I gather the gentleman from New York (Mr. Owens) does see. But this legislation, I do…
The more explicit internal and external review provisions under this new legislation do not and are not intended to expand or contract existing ERISA law. Therefore, these new procedures do not and are not intended to affect whether or the…
I do, indeed, have some troubling thoughts about this bill--H.R. 2746, the HELP Scholarship Act--though obviously well intentioned. The bill is presented as "Parental Choice," but that choice is obviously conditioned upon the right of…
I rise in some reluctant opposition here because I believe that the section 501 codification of the Beck decision in this bill is a poison pill. It simply does not do what it does state that it does. It states that it predicates a…





