Political Quotes

On the recordJuly 27, 2007
In answer to the question of the gentleman from Minnesota, conservation is different from trying to meet an EPA mandate. You can do a tremendous amount of conservation programs for $60,000, but EQIP programs, by their very nature, cost in the hundreds of thousands of dollars. That's the problem. The problem that we have here is that the $60,000 limitation goes into effect. Money may not be available for farmers to be able to meet environmental standards. So this really is a pro-environmental vote. I don't really want to talk about geese. I am talking about cattle. But this all applies to chicken farms and the tremendous runoff that we have. By allowing this amendment and removing the $60,000 cap, this will increase the number of environmentally protected areas in farming across the country. That's the reason for it. It costs no more money, and you might want to spread these programs across the board. I can understand that on conservation, but not on these mandated programs that are title II.
Said by
Donald Manzullo
Illinois

Editor's note · Context

Discussing the impact of funding limitations on environmental conservation programs for farmers.

Share

More from Donald Manzullo

Sep 9, 2012

This legislation will honor President Reagan's leadership and foresight in protecting U.S. interests.

congress.gov
Sep 12, 2012

The consumers in this country are fighting an unknown enemy.

congress.gov
Apr 24, 2012

There is no real rule of law to constrain government behavior.

congress.gov
Jul 25, 2012

I have an amendment at the desk. The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment. The text of the amendment is as follows: Add at the end of the bill the following: TITLE VIII--ENSURING HIGH STANDARDS FOR AGENCY USE OF SCIENTIFIC…

govinfo.gov

Other voices in this conversation