If you are going to do this and you are going to continue with your nuclear ambitions, going in the direction that Senator Rubio has suggested, why would you not sit down with your enemy, negotiate this kind of deal...

I am convinced today that they have done that. I think they have us set up for what could be a real disaster.

I believe you have been fleeced.

A particular challenge for U.S. interests in the region is Iran's pursuit of a rudimentary anti-access/area-denial strategy.

To say this is a--to be able to walk away from this and say that this is a good deal is ludicrous.

Bashar al-Assad would not even be in office today if it were not for Iran.

We violated every rule of good negotiating practice.

This is not a partisan issue in any way: Do you feel that this agreement will keep Iran from getting a nuclear weapon or not?

The word 'perfect' should not even be used in the sentence with this agreement.

Why, after 4 years of stonewalling on these issues by Iran, we, for whatever reason, could think that these are going to be resolved by a couple of side agreements and they are going to be resolved by mid-December, my view is that is just…

If I were the Iranians, I would say, 'Look, all right, let us cut the best deal we can.'

One year after the agreement concluded, the Iranian regime remains as serious of a threat to our national security as ever before.