Mr. Speaker, I would just summarize this case in that it is not only me, it is not Mr. Buck alone, it is not Mr. Sessions alone, it is the American people who are calling out for this kind of relief. It is not just the American people--we might consider them to be laypersons in this--but it is also the courts. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, Judge Harvie Wilkinson, as Mr. Buck quoted, spoke to this issue. The Supreme Court of the United States has spoken to this issue under ``plausible'' versus ``speculative.'' Professor Martin Redish also has spoken on this subject matter. The Third Circuit spoke to the Briscoe issue. The final piece is the Fifth Circuit has essentially adopted a very similar, if not identical, policy. We need to codify this. This is our chance to do so. I urge adoption of the rule and support of the underlying rule.
Share & report
More from Steve King
Mr. Speaker, I move that the House do now adjourn. The motion was agreed to; accordingly (at 8 o'clock and 9 minutes p.m.), under its previous order, the House adjourned until tomorrow, Thursday, January 16, 2020, at 9 a.m…
I think members that support this bill will have a very difficult time explaining to their constituents why they authorized the release of personal cell phone numbers, personal home phone numbers, personal email addresses. Very bad idea.
Madam Speaker, I move that the House do now adjourn. The motion was agreed to; accordingly (at 8 o'clock and 39 minutes p.m.), the House adjourned until tomorrow, Friday, July 26, 2019, at 9 a.m. ____________________
Madam Speaker, it is my privilege to be recognized here on the floor of the House of Representatives, and to be recognized for 30 minutes here as the week closes out and we head back to our districts for Thanksgiving. The scenario that has…





