If the other body is able to find additional resources under section 602(b) allocation to restore the $5.5 million and appropriates the full amount requested by the administration's budget for the Ute Indian settlement, will the subcommittee chairman defer to the other body in conference on this specific appropriation item, so that the obligation to the Ute tribe could be satisfied in this year's appropriation bill?
John Hansen: “If the other body is able to find additional resources under section 602(b) allocation to restore the $5.5 million and…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing funding for the Ute Indian settlement during a congressional session.
Share
More from John Hansen
Mr. Speaker, H.R. 2820 transfers the ownership of the irrigation works currently operated by the Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community. Over the last several years, the subcommittee has moved legislation that has defederalized several…
S. 434 would provide compensation for the Yankton Sioux and Santee Sioux Indian tribes for tribal lands condemned for the Pick-Sloan Missouri River Basin program project. The second title of this bill is the text of my bill, H.R. 4103…
When the President started this tirade, this was the first one he put in was the Grand Staircase Escalante. It has been there 4 years. Money has been appropriated for it. I would be happy, as I told the gentleman from Washington (Mr…
Mr. Speaker, H.R. 4345 amends the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act to clarify the process of allotments to Alaskan Natives who are veterans and makes a number of technical changes to the Alaskan Native Claims Settlement Act. Title I of…





