You do not know who is part of that. But, you know what? Maybe some of those funds were given to this ``charitable'' organization out of a national party, and those were soft money funds used by those donations from the national party. We have talked about the Democrats, okay, and the examples I have given were that. This occurs on both sides of the aisle.
Discussing the influence of soft money in political donations.
Share
More from Greg Ganske
I wish very much that we had more time to see the language of the Norwood amendment so people could fully understand it. I intend to support the rule. I understand fully how my colleagues on the other side of the aisle very well are upset…
Here is what two law professors from New Jersey say: ``In preempting State law, the Norwood amendment goes beyond conduct that involves negligent medical judgment to a particular patient's case. The amendment may, by virtue of the words…
The events of yesterday, September 11, are forever seared into our minds as with branding irons. We grieve for the victims and their families. We pray for them. Let the word go forth to our enemies. We are united in our resolve to avenge…
The underlying Ganske-Dingell bill does have access provisions that I think are bipartisan, for instance, 100 percent deductibility for the self-insured and other small business provisions to help increase access. There will be an…
Other voices in this conversation
