we are about 1 week from having at least 1 day of debate here on the floor of the House of Representatives on managed care reform and, hopefully, we will pass the bipartisan consensus patient protection bill of 1999. There has been a lot of talk about what is in this bill, so I want to go over some of the specifics. And then I want to focus a little bit about some of the miscommunication that has been put out about the bill in regards to its liability section, since I was largely responsible for writing the liability section in a previous bill. First of all, the bipartisan consensus patient protection bill of 1999 deals with access to care. I think the opponents to this legislation want to focus on one issue, and that is the liability provisions. But there is a lot in this bill. This is a comprehensive bill that is important to the people of this country, and it is part of the reason why over 300 organizations, patient advocacy groups, consumer groups, provider groups, have endorsed this bill.
Greg Ganske: “we are about 1 week from having at least 1 day of debate here on the floor of the House of Representatives on managed…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the bipartisan consensus patient protection bill of 1999 and its provisions during House debate.
Share
More from Greg Ganske
let us get into the nitty-gritty of comparing some of the aspects of these bills. Mr. Chairman, I would make a strong argument that the Senate bill has stronger provisions in terms of requirements for screeners than the Young bill. The…
Tuesday, September 11, is forever seared into our minds. We will never forget the images of planes flying into tall buildings and exploding, people choosing to jump off buildings rather than burn to death, buildings collapsing on rescuers…
I want to salute the passion of the gentleman from Alaska (Chairman Young) and the gentleman from Florida (Mr. Mica) and the gentleman from Minnesota (Mr. Oberstar) and the gentleman from Illinois (Mr. Lipinski). I know how much all of…
here is what two law professors from New Jersey say: ``In preempting State law, the Norwood amendment goes beyond conduct that involves negligent medical judgment to a particular patient's case. The amendment may, by virtue of the words…





