That would mean, for instance, that a citizen in Minnesota could cross the border into Canada with a prescription and get it filled there, or a citizen in Texas or Arizona or New Mexico could cross the border and get a prescription filled there, and that would not be illegal. They could bring that back into the United States. That is the gist of the gentleman's amendment; is that correct?
Greg Ganske: “That would mean, for instance, that a citizen in Minnesota could cross the border into Canada with a prescription and…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of an amendment related to prescription drug importation.
Share
More from Greg Ganske
let us get into the nitty-gritty of comparing some of the aspects of these bills. Mr. Chairman, I would make a strong argument that the Senate bill has stronger provisions in terms of requirements for screeners than the Young bill. The…
September 11 did change this country. As we were just discussing here on the floor, all of us have very vivid memories of September 11. We see images seared into our minds of airplanes flying into buildings, those tall World Trade Center…
I am outraged by the corporate scandals that are causing so much pain to Americans. I have listened to fellow Iowans who worked for the natural gas company that merged into Enron tell me with tears in their eyes that most of their pensions…
I stood on this floor arguing for medical malpractice reform, and I continued before that, but not on this bill. Let me read to my colleagues from a letter from the AMA on this. "AMA policy has long supported medical liability reform, and…





