Let us talk for a minute about the cost of liability. We have heard a lot of inflated estimates of this. Texas, as you know, passed a liability provision taking away the exemption for HMOs in Texas. So one of the HMOs asked its actuarial firm how much extra should they raise the cost of a premium, and they asked the actuarial firm that is in the pockets of the HMOs, the one that does all the HMOs' bidding, Milliman & Robertson, well outlined by an expose, I would say, in the Wall Street Journal just recently. Even so, when Milliman & Robertson had to put the number on the line for the company that was actually going to do this, the liability provision would have raised the cost of the premium, I think, 0.3 percent. No, I am sorry, 34 cents per month, 34 cents per month.
Greg Ganske: “Let us talk for a minute about the cost of liability. We have heard a lot of inflated estimates of this. Texas, as you…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the impact of liability provisions on health maintenance organizations (HMOs) and premium costs.
Share
More from Greg Ganske
Here is what two law professors from New Jersey say: ``In preempting State law, the Norwood amendment goes beyond conduct that involves negligent medical judgment to a particular patient's case. The amendment may, by virtue of the words…
The underlying Ganske-Dingell bill does have access provisions that I think are bipartisan, for instance, 100 percent deductibility for the self-insured and other small business provisions to help increase access. There will be an…
I believe there are ethical considerations that enter to the creation of an embryo for research purposes, and that is why I will support the Weldon bill. And I will vote against the Greenwood substitute.
So he stands by his statement that HMOs are treated better in his amendment than others. Now, is it the gentleman's understanding that his bill would abrogate State laws on patients' rights?





