I think we ought to emphasize this: In order to achieve those savings, we cannot just leave the program exactly as it is, because in the current program there are areas of waste, fraud, and abuse that administration, there are a number of areas that we can improve the plan. If we put the structural changes in there, then we can effect some savings and yet we can still maintain good quality.
Greg Ganske: “I think we ought to emphasize this: In order to achieve those savings, we cannot just leave the program exactly as it…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the need for reforms in a government program to reduce waste and improve efficiency.
Share
More from Greg Ganske
employees, pensioners, and investors who have seen their nest eggs disappear from Enron's bankruptcy speak of ``unbearable grief.'' They are also really angry that Enron's executives cashed out while, in many cases, they were locked in…
But there is nothing in the gentleman's amendment that would prevent the FDA from intercepting that shipment, that drug that she had ordered, and testing it, just like they would do if she had ordered it from a retailer in the United…
the economy is sick. Unemployment is going up. The economy does need a shot in the arm. This bill contains provisions to help the unemployed with health care coverage, provisions to encourage business investment and deductions for capital…
I am outraged by the corporate scandals that are causing so much pain to Americans. I have listened to fellow Iowans who worked for the natural gas company that merged into Enron tell me with tears in their eyes that most of their pensions…





