On the recordJuly 24, 1996
The example that my colleague from Massachusetts is citing is exempted. It is the new use of a compositional material. It is specifically excluded in the amendment.
Source
govinfo.govGreg Ganske: “The example that my colleague from Massachusetts is citing is exempted. It is the new use of a compositional material.…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing an amendment related to compositional materials.
Share
More from Greg Ganske
Sep 11, 2001
The events of yesterday, September 11, are forever seared into our minds as with branding irons. We grieve for the victims and their families. We pray for them. Let the word go forth to our enemies. We are united in our resolve to avenge…
Jul 31, 2001
I believe there are ethical considerations that enter to the creation of an embryo for research purposes, and that is why I will support the Weldon bill. And I will vote against the Greenwood substitute.
Jul 31, 2001
I wrote an op ed piece that said, ``Let me make my position absolutely clear. I oppose the cloning of human beings. I favor Federal funding of stem cell research. The potential this research has to cure disease and alleviate human…
Aug 2, 2001
The underlying Ganske-Dingell bill does have access provisions that I think are bipartisan, for instance, 100 percent deductibility for the self-insured and other small business provisions to help increase access. There will be an…
Other voices in this conversation
