A recent survey by Kaiser Family and Harvard interviewed 800 small business executives exactly on this issue. They found that even if there were a mild increase in the cost of a premium related to this, that only 1 to 3 percent of those employers would change their coverage. But the interesting thing was that something like two-thirds of those small business owners and executives agreed with the need for legislation to close that loophole. You might ask, why is that? It is because they are also covered by HMOs. More than 50 percent of them have said, we have seen abuses by HMOs either in our employees or in our own families, and we think there should be a remedy for that.
Greg Ganske: “A recent survey by Kaiser Family and Harvard interviewed 800 small business executives exactly on this issue. They found…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the impact of proposed health legislation on small businesses and their insurance coverage.
Share
More from Greg Ganske
So he stands by his statement that HMOs are treated better in his amendment than others. Now, is it the gentleman's understanding that his bill would abrogate State laws on patients' rights?
And would the gentleman say that the reason for that is that his bill is focusing primarily on the initial creation of this blastocyst or the equivalent of a fertilized egg and the problems that that would have because we would be…
I want to salute the passion of the gentleman from Alaska (Chairman Young) and the gentleman from Florida (Mr. Mica) and the gentleman from Minnesota (Mr. Oberstar) and the gentleman from Illinois (Mr. Lipinski). I know how much all of…
Let me just read to the gentleman a statement by Ari Fleischer today on this issue. The question to him was: Republicans and Democrats believe that the deal struck between Mr. Norwood and the President would abrogate State laws on…





