If that is a given and the opposition criticizes our plan, then does the opposition not have a responsibility to offer their plans? Some of the moderate and conservation Democrats on the other side of the aisle did offer a plan. The fact of the matter is that we just passed another budget bill that basically took into consideration some of the proposals that they had made and the level of savings and, in fact, what we are currently dealing with today are savings of about $160 billion. That is very, very close to what the moderate and conservative Democrats have been for and it is not all that far from what President Clinton has proposed for savings in Medicare.
Greg Ganske: “If that is a given and the opposition criticizes our plan, then does the opposition not have a responsibility to offer…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing budget savings and the responsibility of the opposition to present their plans.
Share
More from Greg Ganske
I wish very much that we had more time to see the language of the Norwood amendment so people could fully understand it. I intend to support the rule. I understand fully how my colleagues on the other side of the aisle very well are upset…
In preempting State law, the Norwood amendment goes beyond conduct that involves negligent medical judgment to a particular patient's case. The amendment made by virtue of the words 'based on' stipulate that State malpractice law does not…
I want to salute the passion of the gentleman from Alaska (Chairman Young) and the gentleman from Florida (Mr. Mica) and the gentleman from Minnesota (Mr. Oberstar) and the gentleman from Illinois (Mr. Lipinski). I know how much all of…
So he stands by his statement that HMOs are treated better in his amendment than others. Now, is it the gentleman's understanding that his bill would abrogate State laws on patients' rights?





