What kinds of harms get us to the table to say why we should even try to talk about changing Section 230.
David Loebsack: “What kinds of harms get us to the table to say why we should even try to talk about changing Section 230.”
Editor's note · Context
Loebsack discusses the motivations for revising Section 230.
Share
More from David Loebsack
Another significant issue is, of course, the lack of transparency that we have regarding the Small Refinery Waiver Program.
Our responsibility is to make sure that Americans have reliable service everywhere and we do need to make sure that that access isn't being unfairly blocked or slowed down or degraded.
Net neutrality, obviously, is a very important issue with this committee--I think for the country, and I am really glad that we are taking action today or at least beginning that process.
I thank the gentlewoman for yielding. I appreciate that very much. My amendment will ensure level funding for distributed wind technologies and research within the Department of Energy's wind energy program. Distributed wind is the use of…





