Chuck Grassley

If the majority get their way, Americans can expect to pay much more to put gas in their cars, and to heat their homes.

Climate change isn't the primary driver of insurance rates hikes, and collapse of the insurance industry isn't imminent.

Inflation has become embedded in the economy, and the historic levels of borrowing by the Federal Government are crowding out the private sector.

65 percent of Americans report that entrenched inflation has made their financial situation worse off under the Biden administration.

President Biden and the majority would like us all to ignore our exploding $34 trillion debt.

If the Federal Government is going to remain ready to respond to the natural disasters and national emergencies, we have to have the capability of doing that, and it seems to me that begs to put the nation's fiscal house in order.

Yeah. We don't have a budget resolution for 2025.

Expensive liberal policies, not climate change, are much to blame for these market dynamics.

It's probably time, or past time, to get back to an adult conversation among elected officials about getting the Federal Government back on a sustainable fiscal path.

The majority refuses to write a budget, or work together to curb reckless Washington spending.

I have been for closing those loopholes.

I have been a strong advocate for higher reference prices.

The quick attribution of everything that happens to climate change flattens our understanding.

Activists often adopt scientific arguments as a source of a moral legitimation for their movements which can be radical and destructive rather than rational and constructive.

Immediate attention to those climate threats and other global challenges goes beyond traditional national security priorities; however, it must be aligned and integrated with them.

The most comprehensive and serious challenge to the United States national security is PRC's coercive and increasingly aggressive endeavor to refashion the Indo Pacific region and the international system to suit its interests and…

Climate change will continue to drive instability around the world, recognition that the opening Arctic will create new dimensions in great power competition.

In the past, Congress has explicitly acknowledged the security impacts of climate change as a direct threat to U.S. national security.

I agree that climate change presents some national security related challenges.

China has a defense budget of $230 billion, but like many statistics published by the country's communist government, the numbers are very suspect.

I am worried that we would over regulate it.

I think we need to make sure that any new quality metrics are easily collected using existing technology and that we're not adding additional administrative burden for data collection for these metrics.

Our country spends more than $4.5 trillion annually on healthcare.

Reducing administrative burdens in healthcare is a very important and top priority issue.

How should we approach regulating Artificial Intelligence, given the impact of top-down regulations on current technology?