Brian Schatz

I would be remiss if I didn't mention because people back home, and I don't mean just back home where I live, but back home where all of us live, cannot understand how the CEO of Equifax and the CEO of Yahoo! walked away with $90 million…

Are we your customers? Are people--the people that--the people whose data was breached, are we your customers, or are the lenders your customers?

Do you think consumers should be able to see the same information that their bank uses when the bank makes a credit decision?

We're redefining broadband from 25 down, 3 up to 10 down, 1 up.

To close this gap, we need more accurate information to start.

This bill lifts outdated restrictions on originating sites and geographic requirements and does so in ways that can better control costs for Medicare.

We should be making it easier for organizations like the Lanai Community Health Center to cut costs and improve care with these technologies.

IoT brings great opportunity for everyone, regardless of their zip code.

Climate change is real. Carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas.

I believe carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas. I believe that humans have contributed to carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.

Global warming theories should not drive national energy policy without clear evidence.

Climate warming trends over the past century are extremely likely due to human activities.

But it is the right choice for some number of millions of Americans, is it not?

The basic question is: Who should incur the costs of those mistakes--you guys or the rest of the country?

But my question is: Why not all three, and why not as a matter of course?

Why did the company that made the mistake make a profit off of that mistake?

Why do I have to pay for a freeze?

I am not asking you about a requirement. I am asking you why you generate revenue off of the mistakes of the organizations that you represent.

I am asking you when a mistake occurs and 144 million people are told to do a certain thing, that certain thing should be free, shouldn't it?

And why would not you inform the public about it?

You do not do it very well for a living, except to the extent that you make massive profits off of making mistakes.

It seems to me that that is material. It seems to me that that is reportable, and whether or not you follow the letter of the law, it seems to me that investors ought to know if something is going to impact the company.

So you decided not to disclose it at all?

I think these are important questions, because we're moving forward apace on all of this, and it's a non-trivial question whether or not a private sector company will now be in possession of not just personally identifying information in…

I mean, I know that sounds, you know, borderline sassy.