This new majority has once again promised us an open and fair process, but again they have failed to live up to the promises now that they're out from under the spotlight of their election year. This is extremely disappointing considering the remarkable importance of the legislation before us today, the Homeland Security Authorization Act. Among some of the provisions that were stripped out of the bill completely, a pilot program for mobile biometric identification of illegal aliens apprehended at sea, denying alien smugglers use of maritime routes and enhanced penalties for alien smuggling, and requiring immigration checks for employees at high-risk critical infrastructures. What's so scary about those being in the bill, I would ask? What idea or what one amendment was so scary that inspired this restrictive rule? I urge my colleagues not to be scared, not to hide behind this rule. Vote ``no'' on this rule so that we can have a complete and fair debate. The American people deserve no less, and they're watching.
Tom Price: “This new majority has once again promised us an open and fair process, but again they have failed to live up to the…”
On the recordMay 9, 2007
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Addressing concerns about the legislative process regarding the Homeland Security Authorization Act.
Share
More from Tom Price
Jan 23, 2017
I think the CHIP program, with policymakers, has to be looked at, and I believe it ought to be extended.
Jun 14, 2017
We have, in essence, transferred over the past 30 to 40 years the treatment of mental health individuals... to a remarkably substandard care in our criminal justice system.
Sep 27, 2017
What I want to say to the speaker, don't you fly over our country in your luxury jet and lecture us on what it means to be an American.
May 4, 2017
I think it's absolutely vital that victims of -- domestic violence and others, anybody, we need a system in place that ensures that individuals are either not priced out of the market --





