If we did not have a 60-vote requirement on amendments, or dealing with any issue in this bill, then it is possible that we could adopt amendments, by less than a majority of the Members of the Senate, which could hamper our intelligence community. And on this critical, sensitive, most important piece of legislation, for us to pass an amendment without a 60-vote requirement really makes no sense at all. I think all of us would certainly be remiss and derelict in our duties if we didn't insist on a 60-vote requirement.
Saxby Chambliss: “If we did not have a 60-vote requirement on amendments, or dealing with any issue in this bill, then it is possible that…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the importance of a 60-vote requirement for amendments to intelligence legislation.
Share
More from Saxby Chambliss
how much time is remaining? The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator has 5\1/2\ minutes remaining.
today the Senate passed the Water Resources Reform and Development Act. It has been too long since Congress last addressed our water infrastructure, and I want to applaud Chairwoman Boxer and Ranking Member Vitter for their diligent work…
I ask unanimous consent that the time the Senator from California used be added to my time. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there objection?
I ask unanimous consent to speak as in morning business. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered. Tribute to Martha Scott Poindexter





