I yield to the gentleman from Massachusetts. Mr. McGOVERN. I would just say that the bill has changed over the years, and I voted against it in committee. I guess the question is: If we are all in agreement that we want to protect women and children, what was the harm in making in order an amendment that would have done that? It was perfectly germane, and the Rules Committee decided not to make it in order. I think that is a question that the gentleman hasn't answered. I appreciate that all the people on the Agriculture Committee are experts, but you know what? There are other people who know a lot about science, pesticides, and agriculture who were not on the committee. And just because a committee takes action--I mean, if that is the new rule now: if you are on the committee, you can't offer amendments. Well, that is an unfortunate new approach that the Republicans are taking.
Rob Woodall: “I yield to the gentleman from Massachusetts. Mr. McGOVERN. I would just say that the bill has changed over the years…”
Share
More from Rob Woodall
On that I demand the yeas and nays. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to section 3 of House Resolution 965, the yeas and nays are ordered. The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--yeas 230, nays 180, not voting 20, as…
Again, thinking about things that the American people are looking for and the opportunities we have to craft those in a bipartisan way, Mr. Stauber brings his lifetime of law enforcement experience to this Chamber, giving us an opportunity…
I share with my friend from New York that I don't have any speakers remaining, and I am prepared to close. Can I ask how much time is remaining, Mr. Speaker. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman from Georgia has 5\1/2\ minutes remaining…
Though this bill is going nowhere, if we defeat the previous question this morning, I will offer an amendment to take up three bills that are partnership bills that can go through the Senate to the President's desk and make a real…





