I say, in broad terms, that I support what the gentleman from Oregon has just said. I served with him on the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee. I was one of the folks who supported the bill that unanimously left committee. The great State of Georgia is dependent on the Port of Savannah, about which the gentleman from Oregon has just laid out the critical funding infrastructure needs. The question with the harbor maintenance trust fund, I want to be clear, is not one of the diversions of those resources. We often talk about trust funds as if someone is dipping his hand in and taking money out of the trust funds, and there is not a single person who works at a single port in the great State of Georgia who believes that is true-- because it is not. The trust fund still sits there. The gentleman's point is that we should be spending the money in the trust fund, and he is absolutely right about that. Correct any misunderstanding. No one is spending those resources elsewhere. Those resources are still in the trust fund, and they ought to be spent.…
On the recordSeptember 27, 2016
Source
govinfo.govShare
More from Rob Woodall
Jun 25, 2020
If we defeat the previous question, I will amend the rule to provide for consideration of H. Res. 1023, a resolution by Mr. Steube. Madam Speaker, I yield 5 minutes to the gentleman from Ohio (Mr. Jordan), the ranking member and one of the…
Jun 30, 2020
I think my friend from New York is right that in the time of a healthcare pandemic that having a closed rule could have been a possibility. In fact, I have no doubt that the only reason we have any amendments at all available on the floor…
Sep 15, 2020
On that I demand the yeas and nays. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to section 3 of House Resolution 965, the yeas and nays are ordered. The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--yeas 219, nays 170, not voting 41, as…





