As I said earlier, when considering any legislation, the House should first determine whether legislation is needed and, next, whether the bill under consideration will adequately address or improve the situation. Before H.R. 2062 was brought to the House floor, the Committee on Education and Labor did not have a standalone hearing on the bill and instead held a subcommittee-level hearing on multiple, wide-ranging topics. This complex and sweeping legislation deserves further examination by the committee so Members can gather more information from a variety of experts to make an informed decision regarding its practicality. Supporters of H.R. 2062 claim the Supreme Court's 2009 decision in the Gross case and 2013 decision in the Nassar case have harmed workers who faced age discrimination or unlawful retaliation for claiming discrimination. Publicly available data does not show that the Supreme Court decisions in the Gross or Nassar cases have discouraged individuals from filing EEOC charges.…
Share & report
More from Rick Allen
I thank the ranking member for her work on this important legislation. In fact, you can't miss it. Above our flag here have the words ``In God We Trust.'' Really? Our Nation's Founders rightly recognized that every human being has a…
Well, it is election time. You need to recruit golfers. That is what I do. I say, who are the golfers here on the campaign trail? ____________________
Over the past 2 years, one thing has become clear: This administration cares more about advancing its radical Green New Deal agenda than about the financial well-being of the American people. We have seen it with their energy policy, but…
I thank my colleague, Mr. Keller, for leading this important effort in letting the American people know that we are fighting for you. As I said since day one, folks should consult with their doctor and get the vaccine if they are able. But…





