I do rise to support the underlying rule and the bill, H.R. 1868, the Technology Innovation and Manufacturing Stimulation Act of 2007. I want to take the opportunity to thank my chairman on the Subcommittee on Technology and Innovation, David Wu from the great State of Oregon, for incorporating into this bill the many suggestions and additions from our colleagues on both sides of the aisle, as well as the administration. The final legislation is a better product because of that, and, David Wu, I thank you so much. Last year, with his American Competitiveness Initiative, President Bush provided a vision to maintain America's position in the global marketplace by actually doubling the investment in physical science research over the next 10 years. H.R. 1868 helps fulfill that mission.
Phil Gingrey: “I do rise to support the underlying rule and the bill, H.R. 1868, the Technology Innovation and Manufacturing…”
Editor's note · Context
Supporting the Technology Innovation and Manufacturing Stimulation Act of 2007 during House floor debate.
Share
More from Phil Gingrey
But, you know, here we are 50 years later, these States, and one of them is mine, the great State of Georgia, is far, far beyond that, and yet we are under section 5 of the Voting Rights Act for another 25 years.
I thank Jim for yielding some of his time. Primarily, I will report on the Congressional Study Groups program. As a Member, I had the honor of co-chairing the Congressional Study Group on Germany for, I think, 4 years. It was absolutely…
I have been chiefly concerned about the effects of the age band compression provisions on these young people we are talking about.
All of these mandates, all this mandated coverage, comes at a tremendous price.





